EVE Online ETC Game Time Card Codes delivered to your email within minutes 24x7

CSM Lot's of sandwiches and lashings of ginger beer

Submitted by Max Torps on Mon, 09/06/2008 - 16:48.

I think a quote from Enid Blyton, the well known childrens author is appropriate for this piece given the way that the CSM is turning.

I've personally never met Jade Constantine but the fact that he has been banned from forums before and with his general conduct striking me as being of a bullying nature just winds me up no end.

When I ran for CSM I was obviously very disappointed I didn't get in, however in reality I didn't expect much else given that:

A: I'm an unknown person in comparison to the winning well known forum personalities and leaders of alliances.

B: I wasn't aware of some of the circles that other candidates (Hardin and Jade) mixed in. It is no surprise to me that they both received the highest votes and it wouldn't be much of a stretch of the imagination to figure many of the votes came from similar sources...the RP forums external to Eve Online. Of course, I can now campaign there if I run again at some point.

I was extremely pleased with the 297 votes I did get though, for an unknown to achieve that was something I was quite proud of, thank you.

Anyway, I digress. It really doesn't matter where the votes for Jade came from. It's what those voters are now thinking that matters.

Did you get value from your vote?

We seem to have a power grabbing, manipulative egomaniac now at the head of the CSM on record as throwing his weight around inappropriately.

Honestly...did noone see this coming? Are you happy with it? Honestly?

Not for the first time I have found myself agreeing with Darius Johnson.

I'm also shocked to see LaVista Vista prize himself from Jade's rear end to publicly criticise him for once, so things must be bad...

I even find myself agreeing with Ankh, bless her, severely criticising the conduct in the meeting.

CCP had better be careful with this. It can only go a number of ways and the majority not good.

I really hope that the rest of the CSM place a vote of no confidence in the current chair, Jade Constantine as he has abused power and publicly brought disgrace onto the entire CSM project by his actions and his actions alone.

Although despite what Jade Constantine says, he doesn't need the others to vote him down. He can step down graciously. It will be interesting to see if that actually happens.

Hardin is the obvious choice for a replacement and I cannot think of a more balanced and passionate person to take on this role.

Read the Official Meeting thread and others listed below to learn more...

__________________________

Login or register to tag items
yea

Hardin is a great choise.

Submitted by salvi (not verified) on Mon, 23/06/2008 - 12:23.
Pretty outrageous blog posting

Just had this blog posting pointed out to me and I have to say its pretty poor sportsmanship for an unsuccessful CSM candidate to try so hard to blacken the name of the person who won the popular vote.

Max, what you wrote above bares not even a passing resemblance to what has happened in the CSM process so far and last weekend we had an extremely successful face to face meeting in Iceland in the eyes of international press coverage and a well-qualified professional moderator.

We made real progress as a council and everyone has tried hard to make this thing a success. I realize you must be disappointed by your own performance in the elections but there really is no call to use a public blog to try and smear the reputation of your rivals.

Please stop it.

Submitted by Jade Constantine on Mon, 30/06/2008 - 02:39.
Max Torps's picture
That blog was posted

That blog was posted 09/06/08 and the related links provide further info where a number of people seem to share similar opinions. However, a blog is that. It is a journal, a diary if you like of thoughts and opinions. A snapshot in time.

You are posting as if this was a recent blog taking into account the recent meeting. This was a snapshot of my opinion on the posting date.

It does not take into account the recent visit to Iceland by the CSM delegates because that hadn't happened on that date, it happened much later.

I would blog about the successes of that but it isn't clear what those successes are, indeed some media reports differences between CCP's expectations and what was delivered by the CSM.

However good luck in what you do.


Submitted by Max Torps on Thu, 03/07/2008 - 17:21.

Log in to lose me

If you register and log in, this advert disappears.

User login

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.